| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project
Surely You're Joking
568
   |
Posted - 2014.04.29 23:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:I hope this is just the beginning of the power projection nerf. Look at all the "Blue Donut" members whining already. 
I live in lowsec and I think this is an awful idea. The closest tie my alliance has to nullsec is the occasional batphone.
Increasing isotope use of capitals in response to... what, an anticipated drop off in isotope use in towers? More towers will be put up as their usefulness increases and they are easier to use, so that isn't going to happen.
It's not a power projection nerf, its just a stupid change. Come on Fozzie, you used to be great at these things, remember your ship rebalancing?
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |
M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project
Surely You're Joking
568
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 23:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Paul Tsukaya wrote:I bet if I went back, I could find a thread where people complained that nerfing technetium would completely ruin the little guy 
I dare you to, no small entity owned Tech.
Small entities DO use capitals. And jump freighters. And POSs.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |
M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project
Surely You're Joking
568
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 23:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:CCP starts poking the "elephant in the room", entitled people start to cry.
Power projection is huge problem in this game and this is the first step to fix it. Props to CCP.
Because making the alliances that can afford to replace 50 titans are going to care about bridging costs going up some?
This isn't goign to hurt the power blocs, and it isn't a power porjection nerf, it just makes moving capitals more expensive, something that doesn't hurt established alliances as much as smaller alliances.
Paul Tsukaya wrote:Still waiting on someone from the likes of Mordus Angels, Dirt Nap Squad, IRED, Triumvirate, Sev3rance etc to weigh in on how this change will effect their small alliance.
I think we've heard enough from the CFC how much the small alliances they care about so very very much will suffer.
'Small' lowsec alliance checking in, this change is stupid, they are fixing an anticipated effect that isn't going to happen (less isotopes used on POSs? Not with POSs becoming more useful) by messing up capital and BLOPs usage.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |
M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project
Surely You're Joking
583
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 01:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Araneatrox wrote:To me this does not seem to fix any problems with power projection.
What i would like to see is
"Fuel can no longer be stored in Fleet/Corp Hangars"
There we are, Power projection fixed without hurting Jump Frieghter and Black ops pilots.
Then fleets would simply bring a jump freighter full of Helitopes to fuel their Archon blob. Limiting fuel isn't going to change the way power is projected in EVE. At least not with normal capitals (it might affect Titan bridging, but that would have an adverse effect on small alliances compared to larger alliances)
The preemptive fuel change is illogical given the new design plan of a patch every 6 weeks, if fuel prices fall off the map or skyrocket, the changes can be made either in the 1.1 patch, or the next planned cycle.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |
| |
|